for ethnowoman
Dec. 16th, 2013 11:42 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
The selling of Attention Deficit Disorder, in the NY Times.
It's really hard to know what's true, when so many of the sources of information are comprimised by commercial interests.
I find it hard to believe that an MD researcher who receives millions in speaking fees from a pharam company isn't influenced by their funding. How on earth would your research ever say, 'actually, we've discovered ADD isn't that common, we should reclassify this drug' after you've taken their money?
The marketing to parents is just insidious.
It's really hard to know what's true, when so many of the sources of information are comprimised by commercial interests.
I find it hard to believe that an MD researcher who receives millions in speaking fees from a pharam company isn't influenced by their funding. How on earth would your research ever say, 'actually, we've discovered ADD isn't that common, we should reclassify this drug' after you've taken their money?
The marketing to parents is just insidious.
no subject
Date: 2013-12-16 05:40 pm (UTC)I think this marketing blitz can have mixed good and bad benefits: the negative, as noted, but the positive benefits is that the marketers are working to de-stigmatize ADHD, not out of altruism, but the result is the same. Even now I hear a lot of fear of stigma from other moms, fear of being their kids being "labelled", etc, and if that could go away then the kids who truly need help could get it easier.
What I find interesting about the ADHD thing is that we ascribe a lot of negative qualities to them when it's actually a disorder (laziness, carelessness, etc), and the medication, in essence, makes them "more virtuous" people.
My personal theory is that, like autism, there's a lot that could be done for the kids in terms of behavioural skills if they can learn them early. My worst ADD/ ADHD kids this year belong to VERY flakey moms who clearly don't have the skills to create a calm, structured environment where their kids could thrive. My brother has a profoundly ADHD kid who does just fine without medication but then he and his wife are both child-care/education professionals and they've instituted major coping strategies for their son at home and at school which are super successful.
Like so many things, I suspect that most kids who are truly ADHD could be treated reasonably well with home intervention and classroom assistance. The major benefit to this would be that they would learn coping strategies that they could carry into adulthood. The problem, for parents who are not education professionals and haven't a clue how to help their child at home, is that it's far easier and cheaper to get pills than to get subsidized home and school intervention, and for this reason I doubt that it will take off in the near future.
no subject
Date: 2013-12-17 10:39 am (UTC)I once chatted to a man who ran adventure courses for kids who had been excluded from school. He said the discipline of daily activity, especially physical activity, helped them a lot. They were not expected to ever go back into school. I asked him what proportion of those children had ADHD, he said "Oh, most of them". I asked if any of them were being treated for it, he said, no.
no subject
Date: 2013-12-19 06:39 pm (UTC)