Personally, I disagree with the assessment. I love both cats equally for different reasons, but Megan is very high maintenance. Molly is the opposite, so I would have thought that would result in an objectively higher rating for Molly. I guess they rate HM cats as ideal. The only answers that were different were Mileage (Megan was High Maintenance, Molly was Fur-to-middling), Running Condition (Megan was Good, Molly was Non-runner, but will trot to the food bowl) and Interior Condition (Megan was Full of prawns, Molly was Rumbly).
no subject
Date: 2011-10-06 04:04 pm (UTC)Slinky pulls in nearly 10GBP more than that:
webuyanycat.com has valued my cat at £14.44.
I think it must be the sneer on her face that's garnering her extra value.
And one would've thought that the sheer cuteness of the model would've caused Widget to get more than 10GBP!
webuyanycat.com has valued my cat at £10.27.
no subject
Date: 2011-10-06 04:42 pm (UTC)Megan:
webuyanycat.com has valued my cat at £9.37.
Molly:
webuyanycat.com has valued my cat at £5.19.
Personally, I disagree with the assessment. I love both cats equally for different reasons, but Megan is very high maintenance. Molly is the opposite, so I would have thought that would result in an objectively higher rating for Molly. I guess they rate HM cats as ideal. The only answers that were different were Mileage (Megan was High Maintenance, Molly was Fur-to-middling), Running Condition (Megan was Good, Molly was Non-runner, but will trot to the food bowl) and Interior Condition (Megan was Full of prawns, Molly was Rumbly).
Thanks for posting this. Fun to play. :)
no subject
Date: 2011-10-06 08:44 pm (UTC)webuyanycat.com has valued my cat at £20.44.
no subject
Date: 2011-10-07 07:52 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-10-10 11:07 am (UTC)But far better to be honest about these things. :-)